<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Hydraulics &#187; archaeology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thehydraulics.com/tag/archaeology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thehydraulics.com</link>
	<description>Perfect Building for Better Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 02:06:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Urban scene of the week: The fence pier</title>
		<link>http://www.thehydraulics.com/heritage-structure/urban-scene-of-the-week-the-fence-pier/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehydraulics.com/heritage-structure/urban-scene-of-the-week-the-fence-pier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heritage Structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archaeology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehydraulics.com/?p=68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TheHydraulics.com will feature an &#8220;urban scene of the week&#8221; of Hydraulics sights and scenes on a roughly weekly basis &#8211; weekly, meaning &#8220;whenever the inspiration and the camera intersect.&#8221; This week, the highlight is the fence pier of Frank Lloyd Wright&#8217;s Larkin Administration Building, built in 1904 and demolished in 1950, with the exception of [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.thehydraulics.com/" target="_blank">TheHydraulics.com</a> will feature an &#8220;urban scene of the week&#8221; of Hydraulics sights and scenes on a roughly weekly basis &#8211; weekly, meaning &#8220;whenever the inspiration and the camera intersect.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This week, the highlight is the fence pier of Frank Lloyd Wright&#8217;s Larkin Administration <a href="http://www.thehydraulics.com/landmark/urban-scene-of-the-week-over-the-rail/" target="_blank">Building</a>, built in 1904 and demolished in 1950, with the exception of this one lone artifact. The fence pier, on Swan Street, is all that remains of Wright&#8217;s masterpiece, what was considered by <a href="http://www.thehydraulics.com/tag/original-design/" target="_blank">architecture</a> critic Henry-Russel Hitchcock to be &#8220;the most important building ever demolished in the 20th century.&#8221;<span id="more-68"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.thehydraulics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/img_1243.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-69" title="Urban scene of the week: The fence pier" src="http://www.thehydraulics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/img_1243.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="405" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The pier was an obscure piece of urban archaeology until local Larkin buffs, among them Jerry Puma, succeeded in 2003 in seeing the pier restored to some semblance of its <a href="http://www.thehydraulics.com/2009/11/" target="_blank">original</a> state. Prior to the restoration, the few Wright experts in the know were chipping away at the pier to get their own souvenir of the Wright icon. The fence pier, not actually a pier of the building, but a pier of the fence that <a href="http://www.thehydraulics.com/sitemap/" target="_blank">surrounded</a> it, was perhaps a tangible enough connection to the complex to merit, in their minds, such incremental acts of destruction.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Here&#8217;s a ponderous thought for our readers: Why was this fragment spared? When everything else was smashed and pummeled, why was this left behind? One wonders&#8230; did the demolition contractors step back, after destroying a world-significant artwork, and seeing that all that was left was part of a fence, decide to keep this solitary remnant for future generations to rediscover? Is this the only evidence of their sense of guilt?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Or are these questions too charitable? Is the real story that the contractors simply ran out of money after expending far more than they ever imagined to demolish what was meant to last for centuries, and said &#8220;the hell with it&#8221; when the job was nearly finished?</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehydraulics.com/heritage-structure/urban-scene-of-the-week-the-fence-pier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
